Appeal No. 1997-3242
Application 07/929,834
through 6 and 8 through 10 of copending application 08/249,689. Appellant does not
dispute the merits of any of these rejections. See page 4 of the Brief. As appellant has
not argued that the rejections are improper, we affirm them.
CONCLUSION
We have reversed the rejection of claims 1 through 14 for lack of enablement, but
affirmed the provisional double patenting rejections of claims 1 through 5 and 7 through 14.
As a result of our action today, claim 6 is free of rejection.
AFFIRMED-IN PART
)
William F. Smith )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Toni R. Scheiner )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Demetra J. Mills )
Administrative Patent Judge )
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007