Ex parte HARA et al. - Page 1




                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         

                                                                                  Paper No.  36              
                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                                ____________                                                 
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                        
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                
                                                ____________                                                 
                                         Ex parte TAKAHISA HARA,                                             
                                           MASAHITO MATSUMOTO,                                               
                                                    and                                                      
                                              HITOSHI NAKADA                                                 
                                                ____________                                                 
                                           Appeal No. 1997-3249                                              
                                        Application No. 08/267,768                                           

                                                  ON BRIEF                                                   
                                        __________________________                                           
            Before WARREN, LIEBERMAN, and PAWLIKOWSKI,  Administrative Patent Judges.                        
            LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                

                      THE INVENTION                                                                          


                                                THE CLAIM                                                    
                                                                                                            




                          THE REFERENCE OF RECORD                                                            
            As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon the following reference:                    







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007