Ex Parte BURDICK et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board      
                                                                                     
                                                             Paper No. 21             
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                  Ex parte CHARLES L. BURDICK and THOMAS J. PODLAS                    
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-3307                                  
                             Application No. 08/121,402                               
                                    _____________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    _____________                                     
            Before MCKELVY, Senior Administrative Patent Judges, PAK                  
            and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.                            
                                                                                     
            PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                 

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                 This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection                
            of claims 1-6, which are all of the claims pending in the                 
            application.                                                              
                 The subject matter on appeal is represented by product               
            claim 1, and process claims 5 and 6, reproduced below:                    
                 1.  An aqueous fluidized polymer suspension comprising               
            at least 20% by total weight of the suspension of at least                
            one polymer selected from the group of methylcellulose,                   
            methythydroxypropylcellulose, and                                         
            methythydroxyethylcellulose polymer, the polymer having a                 
            bulk density of 0.03 g/cc or greater, dispersed in an                     
            aqueous solution of at least one salt dissolved therein.                  




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007