Ex Parte PEIFFER et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-3497                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/312,295                                                  

                    proplylene polymer of said propylene polymer                      
                    ply having:                                                       
                         an n-heptane-insoluble fraction which                        
                    has a triad-related chain isotaxy index,                          
                    measured by means of 13C-NMR spectrosopy, of                      
                    about 95 to about 96%,                                            
                         a modulus of elasticity of the film                          
                    structure in the longitudinal direction which                     
                    is greater than 2,500 N/mm2 and a modulus of                      
                    elasticity of the film structure in the                           
                    transverse direction which is greater than                        
                    4,000 N/mm2, said moduli of elasticity having                     
                    been determined in accordance with German                         
                    Engineering Standard DIN 53 457;                                  
                         said propylene polymer-containing ply                        
                    containing less than 1% by weight, based on                       
                    the total weight of the film structure, of                        
                    hydrocarbon resin having a molecular weight                       
                    less than 5,000.                                                  
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Shiga et al. (Shiga)               4,283,463      Aug. 11, 1983             
          Matsumoto et al. (Matsumoto)       4,705,828      Nov. 10, 1987             
          Yamamoto et al. (Yamamoto)         5,231,144      Jul. 27, 1993             
               Appellants' additionally refer to the following references,            
          of record, in rebuttal:                                                     
          Suzuki et al. (Suzuki)             4,740,421      Apr. 26, 1988             
          Crass et al. (Crass)               4,786,533      Nov. 22, 1988             
          Schloegl et al. (Schloegl)         5,091,237      Feb. 25, 1992             
               Claims 1, 2, 4-7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16-24 and 28 stand                   
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Shiga             
          and/or Matsumoto, individually or in combination.  Claims 8, 9,             
          12 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                     








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007