Ex parte CAREY et al. - Page 2




         Appeal No. 1997-3868                                      Page 2          
         Application No. 08/538,838                                                


         understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading              
         of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                          
                        1.  A process for encapsulating a                          
                   device without adversely affecting the                          
                   operation and efficiency of the device                          
                   while protecting it from adverse                                
                   environmental conditions, comprising:                           
                        forming a pair of fluoropolymer                            
                   laminates consisting of three layers by                         
                   positioning only a layer of fluoropolymer                       
                   material on a layer of adhesive material                        
                   having a release liner on an opposite side                      
                   thereof;                                                        
                        positioning the thus formed pair of                        
                   laminates in a laminator apparatus;                             
                        removing the release liner of each of                      
                   the pair of fluoropolymer laminates; and                        
                        passing the device to be encapsulated                      
                   through the laminator apparatus such that                       
                   the adhesive material and the fluoropolymer                     
                   material of each of the pair laminates are                      
                   secured on opposite sides of the device.                        
              In addition to admitted prior art1, the prior art                    
         references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting             
         the appealed claims are:                                                  
         Bennett                           2,191,704           Feb. 27,            
         1940                                                                      
         Turner                            3,970,502           Jul. 20,            
         1976                                                                      
         Anagnostou et al. (Anagnostou)    4,083,097           Apr. 11,            
         1978                                                                      

              1 Appellants’ specification at page 9, lines 14-16 and 19-           
         22.                                                                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007