Appeal No. 1997-3874
Application 08/446,295
The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
follows: claims 22-24 and 28-32 over Rausing in view of
Taillie and either Schoder or Suzuki, and claim 33 over
Rausing in view of Taillie and Imperial.2
OPINION
We reverse the aforementioned rejections.
Rejection over Rausing in view of Taillie and
either Schoder or Suzuki
We need to address only claim 22, which is the sole
independent claim.
Rausing discloses a method for producing documents such
as passports, membership books and identification documents
from a web by applying a thin coating of adhesive to one side
of the web, printing text onto the other side of a web,
folding the web to form a book page such that coatings of
adhesive face one another, and joining the coatings of
adhesive by simultaneously activating the adhesive and
compressing the folded web (col. 1, line 62 - col. 2, line 9;
2 Although claim 33 depends from claim 22, the examiner
does not reject claim 22 over Rausing in view of Taillie and
Imperial.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007