Ex Parte TAKEGAMI et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 1997-4188                                                                        
            Application No. 08/373,528                                                                  


            7, 10 through 15, and 28 under rejection, with claims 21 through                            
            25, and 27 being allowed.                                                                   


                  Appellants’ invention pertains to a fuel tank, fuel pump                              
            arrangement for supplying fuel to an internal combustion engine.                            
            A basic understanding of the invention can be derived from a                                
            reading of exemplary claims 1 and 15, copies of which appear in                             
            the APPENDIX to the substitute brief (Paper No. 30).                                        


                  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the                              
            documents listed below:1                                                                    
            Fedelem et al                 4,790,185                      Dec. 13, 1988                  
            (Fedelem)                                                                                   
            Weaver                        4,651,701                      Mar. 24, 1987                  
            Yamamoto                      61-104289                      Jul.  2, 1986                  
            (Japan)                                                                                     
            Sato                          63-029676                      Jan. 20, 1982                  
            (Japan)                                                                                     

                  The following rejection is before us for review.                                      





                  1 Our understanding of the two listed Japanese documents is                           
            derived from a reading of translations thereof prepared for the                             
            United States Patent and Trademark Office.  Copies of the                                   
            respective translations are appended to this opinion.                                       
                                                   2                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007