Ex parte MICHELMAN - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-4310                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/371,362                                                  


               introducing into said substantially aqueous environment a              
          chemical agent to modify said chemical compound to render said              
          chemical compound capable of dispersing said wax;                           
               agitating said paper having said hot melt coating thereon              
          in said substantially aqueous environment; and                              
               dispersing said wax from said paper.                                   

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Savage                        2,959,513                Nov. 08,             
          1960                                                                        
          Laumann                       3,950,578                Apr. 13,             
          1976                                                                        
          Gotoh et al. (Gotoh)          4,177,199                Sep. 26,             
          1978                                                                        
               Appellant also cites the following references:                         
          Goto et al. (Goto)                 JP 61-47896         Mar. 08,             
          1996                                                                        
          Michelman et al. (Michelman), “Repulpability of coated                      
          corrugated paperboard,” Tappi Journal, Vol. 74, No. 10, pp.                 
          79-82 (Oct. 1991).                                                          
               Claims 23 and 57-61 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as being unpatentable over Laumann in view of Savage.  Claims               
          23, 46 and 57-64 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being              
          unpatentable over Gotoh in view of Savage and Laumann.                      


                                       OPINION                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007