Appeal No. 1997-4422 Application 08/269,797 Ahland et al. (Ahland) 4,833,877 May 30, 1989 Bissett et al. (Bissett) 5,069,685 Dec. 03, 1991 Ayala 5,188,811 Feb. 23, 1993 Brown et al. (Brown) 5,220,782 Jun. 22, 1993 Rehmat et al. (Rehmat) 5,243,922 Sep. 14, 1993 Nowitzki et al. (Nowitzki) 5,391,530 Feb. 21, 1995 Masuo Inaba et al. (Masuo)* 64-15135 Jan. 19, 1989 *Japanese reference, English translation Krishnan et al. (Krishnan), “Study of Ammonia Removal in Coal Gasification Processes”, SRI International, Sep. 1998. Copperthwaite et al. (Copperthwaite), “Cobalt Chromium Oxide: A Novel Sulphur Tolerant Water-Gas shift Catalyst”, Applied Catalysis 63 L11-L16, 1990. Claims 24, 26, 28-34, and 38 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Rehmat, Bissett, Flockenhaus, Suggitt, Aldridge, Shah, Ayala, Krishnan, Copperthwaite, Deinert, the Kimura patents, Takahashi, Graboski, Babu, Ahland, and the admitted state of the prior art as set forth on pages 1 and 2 of appellants’ application. Claim 27 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Rehmat or Bissett, taken with Flockenhaus, Suggitt, Aldridge, Shah, Ayala, Krishnan, Copperthwaite, Deinert, the Kimura patents, Takashi, Graboski, Babu, Ahland, and the admitted state of the prior art as set forth on pages 1 and 2 of appellants’ application as applied to claims 24, 26, 28-34 and 38 above, and further in view of Brown. Claims 35 and 36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Rehmat or Bissett, taken with Flockenhaus, Suggitt, Aldridge, Shah, Ayala, Krishnan, Copperthwaite, Deinert, the Kimura patents, Takahashi, Graboski, Babu, Ahland, and the admitted state of the prior art set forth on pages 1 and 2 of appellants’ application as 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007