Ex parte FEITELBERG et al. - Page 3


            Appeal No. 1997-4422                                                      
            Application 08/269,797                                                    

            Ahland et al. (Ahland)         4,833,877           May  30, 1989          
            Bissett et al. (Bissett)            5,069,685           Dec. 03,          
            1991                                                                      
            Ayala                        5,188,811           Feb. 23, 1993          
            Brown et al. (Brown)           5,220,782           Jun. 22, 1993          
            Rehmat et al. (Rehmat)         5,243,922           Sep. 14, 1993          
            Nowitzki et al. (Nowitzki) 5,391,530               Feb. 21, 1995          
            Masuo Inaba et al. (Masuo)* 64-15135               Jan. 19, 1989          
            *Japanese reference, English translation                                  
            Krishnan et al. (Krishnan), “Study of Ammonia Removal in Coal             
            Gasification Processes”, SRI International, Sep. 1998.                    
            Copperthwaite et al. (Copperthwaite), “Cobalt Chromium Oxide:             
            A Novel Sulphur Tolerant Water-Gas shift Catalyst”, Applied               
            Catalysis 63 L11-L16, 1990.                                               
                 Claims 24, 26, 28-34, and 38 stand rejected under 35                 
            U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Rehmat, Bissett,                  
            Flockenhaus, Suggitt, Aldridge, Shah, Ayala, Krishnan,                    
            Copperthwaite, Deinert, the Kimura patents, Takahashi,                    
            Graboski, Babu, Ahland, and the admitted state of the prior               
            art as set forth on pages 1 and 2 of appellants’ application.             
                 Claim 27 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being              
            unpatentable over Rehmat or Bissett, taken with Flockenhaus,              
            Suggitt, Aldridge, Shah, Ayala, Krishnan, Copperthwaite,                  
            Deinert, the Kimura patents, Takashi, Graboski, Babu, Ahland,             
            and the admitted state of the prior art as set forth on pages             
            1 and 2 of appellants’ application as applied to claims 24,               
            26, 28-34 and 38 above, and further in view of Brown.                     
                 Claims 35 and 36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as             
            being unpatentable over Rehmat or Bissett, taken with                     
            Flockenhaus, Suggitt, Aldridge, Shah, Ayala, Krishnan,                    
            Copperthwaite, Deinert, the Kimura patents, Takahashi,                    
            Graboski, Babu, Ahland, and the admitted state of the prior               
            art set forth on pages 1 and 2 of appellants’ application as              


                                             3                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007