Ex Parte SALANDRO - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 18              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte JERRY R. SALANDRO                               
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1998-0148                                  
                                Application 08/317,990                                
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING and HECKER, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
          Appellant’s request for rehearing is granted to the extent that             
          we have in fact reviewed our findings but is denied as to making            
          any change therein.                                                         
                                REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                 
               Appellant requests that we reconsider and modify our                   
          decision mailed July 10, 2000, to indicate that the rejection               
          of claims 1 through 4 is reversed.                                          
               Appellant argues “The heart of the Board’s rejection of                
          Claim 1 is that ‘[t]he connections of matrix 13 are clearly                 

                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007