Ex parte CLINGERMAN et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1998-0220                                                                                       
              Application No. 08/297,437                                                                                 

                                                    BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The invention is directed to two-dimensional digital filters.  Claim 1 is reproduced                
              below.                                                                                                     
              1.     An image processing device for filtering digital image data, comprising:                            
                     a plurality of discrete one-dimensional first dimension filters operating concurrently              
              on real-time digital image data in a first dimension, each of the filters operating on the                 
              digital image data in accordance with predetermined filter coefficients to produce a one-                  
              dimensional output signal;                                                                                 
                     a single second dimension filter, operating in a second, distinct dimension, for                    
              receiving output signals from one of the plurality of first dimension filters and operating on             
              the output signals in real-time in accordance with one of a plurality of sets of                           
              predetermined filter coefficients to produce a second filtered output signal therefrom; and                
                     means, operating in conjunction with the first and second dimension filters, for                    
              controlling the non-predetermined selection of the first dimension filter and the set of filter            
              coefficients to be used as inputs to the second dimension filter.                                          

                     The examiner relies on the following evidence:                                                      
              Thompson et al. (Thompson)                4,766,561                    Aug. 23, 1988                       
              Kobayashi et al. (Kobayashi)              5,131,059                    Jul.   14, 1992                     
              Appellants’ Admitted Prior Art (the APA)                                                                   


                     Claims 1, 2, 8-11, 17, 18, 24, 30, and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                   
              being unpatentable over the APA and Thompson.                                                              
                     Claims 33 and 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                         
              over the APA, Thompson, and Kobayashi.                                                                     

                                                          - 2 -                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007