The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte JUERGEN HAGEDORN
and MANFRED HARTMANN
______________
Appeal No. 1998-0273
Application 08/285,892
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WARREN, OWENS and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
We have carefully considered the record in this appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134, including the
opposing views of the examiner, in the answer, and appellants, in the brief, and based on our review,
find that we cannot sustain the rejection of appealed claims 11 through 30,1 all of the claims in the
application, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hare or Xerox in view of Reed et al.
1 See, e.g., the amendments of August 4, 1994 (Paper No. 15), and November 20, 1995 (Paper No.
17).
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007