Ex Parte HEUNG et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 1998-0346                                                        
          Application No. 08/718,653                                                  
          hydride composite wherein first and second mixtures of particular           
          ingredients are combined to form a sol and metal hydride                    
          particles capable of absorbing and desorbing hydrogen made of a             
          La-Ni-Al alloy are mixed with the sol, whereupon the resulting              
          mixture is gelled and then dried to form an aerogel having the              
          particles uniformly dispersed therein.  This appealed subject               
          matter is adequately illustrated by independent claim 32 which              
          reads as follows:                                                           
               32. A sol-gel method for preparing a metal hydride                     
          composite, said method comprising the steps of:                             
               mixing a first alcohol and water to form a first mixture;              
               adjusting the pH of said first mixture;                                
               mixing a second alcohol and an organometal to form a second            
          mixture;                                                                    
               mixing said first and second mixtures to form a sol;                   
               mixing particles of a metal hydride with said sol to form a            
          third mixture, said particles being capable of absorbing and                
          desorbing hydrogen, said metal hydride particles being made of a            
          La-Ni-Al alloy;                                                             
               gelling said third mixture to form a gel; and                          
               drying said gel to form an aerogel having said particles               
          uniformly dispersed therein.                                                
               The references set forth below are relied upon by the                  
          examiner in the obviousness-type double patenting rejection and             
          the section 103 rejection before us on this appeal:                         

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007