Ex parte SMILEY - Page 2




                  Appeal No. 1998-0427                                                                                                                          
                  Application No. 08/283,466                                                                                                                    


                  Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                                                                  

                            1.  System for managing access to a plurality of data objects, comprising:                                                          

                            first means for storing information describing said plurality of data objects and for storing                                       
                  information describing attributes of said plurality of data objects and for storing information describing                                    
                  relationships therebetween as a separate relationship object;                                                                                 

                            second means for accepting and processing user queries on said information stored in said first                                     
                  means and for generating first results data in response to said user queries;                                                                 

                            third means responsive to said second means for generating second results data using said first                                     
                  results data, said second results data including information contained in said plurality of data objects.                                     


                  The examiner relies on the following references:                                                                                              

                            Crus et al. (Crus)                          5,133,068                    Jul. 21, 1992                                              
                            Heffernan et al. (Heffernan)          5,379,419                    Jan. 03, 1995                                                    


                  Claims 1-3 and 5-8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as anticipated by Heffernan.                                                         

                  Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as unpatentable over Heffernan in view of Crus.                                                   

                  Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the respective positions of appellant and the                                                  

                  examiner.                                                                                                                                     

                                                                         OPINION                                                                                



                  At the outset, we note the broad nature of the claimed subject matter.  In particular, with regard to                                         

                  claim 1, information “describing” a plurality of data objects may not necessarily be different from                                           

                                                                              -2-                                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007