Ex parte BERGOVIST et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-0482                                                        
          Application No. 08/404,908                                                  

          ions from a pulp prior to bleaching and adsorbing the metal                 
          and metal ions into the pulp after bleaching.  Further details              
          of this appealed subject matter are set forth in                            
          representative independent claim 1 which reads as follows:                  
               1. A process for bleaching pulp comprising the steps of:               
               separating from a delignified pulp metals and metal ions               
          to a flow of liquid;                                                        
               bleaching the pulp; and                                                
               contacting the flow of liquid containing metals and metal              
          ions to the bleached pulp under conditions whereby the metals               
          and metal ions are adsorbed into the bleached pulp to thereby               
          remove said metals and metal ions from the flow of liquid.                  
               The references set forth below are relied upon by the                  
          examiner as evidence of obviousness:                                        
          Peter et al. (Peter)               5,145,557           Sep.  8,             
          1992                                                                        
          Lundgren et al. (Lundgren)(EP)     0 402 335           Dec. 12,             
          1990                                                                        
          Schleinkofer, “Overview of a Chlorine-Free Bleaching Process,”              
          Seminar Notes of the Technical Association of the Pulp and                  
          Paper Industry, Tappi Press, pp. 75-78, 1981.                               
               All of the claims on appeal are rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Peter in view of Schleinkofer              
          and Lundgren.                                                               

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007