The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex Parte KOE ENMANJI, ITSUO NISHIYAMA
and KENZO TAKAHASHI
_______________
Appeal No. 1998-0575
Application 08/190,569
_______________
HEARD: March 7, 2001
_______________
Before, GARRIS, WALTZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Applicants appeals the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 9
and 10, all the claim remaining in the application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §
134.1
1The claims on appeal have been amended by an after final amendment, paper no. 29, filed
March 23, 1995. The Examiner indicated the amendment would be entered upon filing an appeal. (Paper
no. 30, mailed March 30, 1995).
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007