The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DAVID W. MARUSKA and JONATHAN C. CROWELL ____________ Appeal No. 1998-0714 Application No. 08/092,622 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before BARRETT, DIXON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 16, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Appellants' invention relates to a clustered computer system. Specifically, the system includes at least two central processing units and a single power source in a cabinet, with one central processing unit enclosed in a housing that can be physically mounted in a disk drive slot ofPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007