Ex parte ADDISON et al. - Page 12




          Appeal No. 1998-0762                                                        
          Application No. 08/379,576                                                  


          the laundry detergent compositions recited in claims 6 through              
          8 within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                    





                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               In summary:                                                            
          1)   The examiner’s § 103 rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 9                 
          through 14, 16 through 18 and 20 over the combined disclosures              
          of Dany ‘895, Dany ‘415 and Painter is affirmed;                            
          2) The examiner’s § 103 rejection of claims 6 through 8 over                
          the combined disclosures of Dany ‘895, Dany ‘415 and Painter                
          is reversed;                                                                
          3)   The examiner’s § 103 rejection of claim 3 over the                     
          combined disclosures of Dany ‘895, Dany ‘415, Painter and                   
          Hartman is affirmed;                                                        
          4)   The examiner’s § 103 rejection of claims 15 and 19 over                
          the combined disclosures of Dany ‘895, Dany ‘415, Painter and               
          Gray is affirmed; and                                                       
          5) The examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 20 under the                
          judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double                      
                                          12                                          





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007