Ex parte COMBE - Page 10




                 Appeal No. 1998-0820                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/274,771                                                                                                             


                 device . . . that writes at one speed and reads at another."                                                7                          
                          Appellant argues on page 10 of the brief that claim 4,                                                                        
                 which formed part of the originally filed specification,                                                                               
                 recites "spindle rotation means connected to said cartridge                                                                            
                 receiving means for rotating [the] removable cartridge at a                                                                            
                 first speed while reading a track of data previously recorded                                                                          
                 by an inductive head at a second speed."  Appellant goes on to                                                                         
                 note that a "two-speed spindle motor 52 simply represents an                                                                           
                 ordinary kind of spindle rotation means for independently                                                                              
                 rotating the removable cartridge at a first speed and a second                                                                         
                 speed."  Appellant concludes that a fair reading of the                                                                                
                 specification will reveal "the drive can run the disk at two                                                                           
                 different speeds."                                                                                                                     
                          We note that the invention of claim 4 at the time of the                                                                      
                 filing date includes "spindle rotation means connected to                                                                              
                 receiving means for rotating said removable cartridge at a                                                                             
                 first speed while reading a track of data previously recorded                                                                          
                 by an inductive head at a second speed with removable                                                                                  
                 cartridge." Therefore, because claim 4 recited the limitation                                                                          
                 originally filed, we find that this is evidence in and of                                                                              

                          7See pages 4 and 8 of the answer.                                                                                             
                                                                        -10-                                                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007