Appeal No. 1998-0823
Application 08/630,542
light passing from a different area of the rear aperture of
the objective lens;
a first camera port disposed in the path of said first
separate beam;
a second camera port disposed in the path of said second
separate beam.
The Examiner relies on the following references:
Heimstadt 1,470,670 Oct. 16,
1923
Braymer 2,753,760 Jul. 10,
1956
Jakubowski 3,820,882 Jun. 28,
1974
Muller et al. (Muller) 4,448,498 May 15,
1984
Kleinberg 4,688,907 Aug. 25,
1987
Minami et al. (Minami) 4,763,968 Aug. 16,
1988
Claim 22 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being anticipated by Heimstadt in view of Muller. Claim 24
stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over Heimstadt in view of Muller and Braymer. Claims 28 and
29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Heimstadt in view of Muller and Jakubowski.
Claims 30 and 35 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Heimstadt in view of Muller, Braymer,
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007