Ex parte DZIEMBOWSKI et al. - Page 6

          Appeal No. 1998-1009                                                         
          Application No. 08/656,733                                                   


          5.  They do not remedy the deficiencies indicated above.                     
               In view of the foregoing, we reverse the examiner’s                     
          decision rejecting all of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103.                                                                       


                                       REVERSED                                        




          CHUNG K. PAK                 )                                               
                    Administrative Patent Judge  )                                     
                                                   )                                   
                                                   )                                   
                                                   )   BOARD OF PATENT                 
                    PETER F. KRATZ               )     APPEALS AND                     
                    Administrative Patent Judge  )    INTERFERENCES                    
                                                   )                                   
                                                   )                                   
                                                   )                                   
                    ROMULO H. DELMENDO           )                                     
                    Administrative Patent Judge  )                                     


          CKP:vsh                                                                      








                                          6                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007