Ex parte YANO - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                                 Paper No. 20         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                  Ex parte YUKIO YANO                                 
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1998-1098                                 
                              Application No. 08/308,426                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and BARRY, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                            SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION ON APPEAL                           
               This is a supplemental decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 134 from the rejection of claims 1-12 and 14-34.  On                      
          September 12, 2000, we issued a decision affirming the                      
          rejection of claims 20-34 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1, and                   
          reversing the rejections of claims 1-12 and 14-19 under 35                  
          U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over AAPA and of claims 20-34 under §               
          103 as obvious over AAPA in view of Fox.                                    







Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007