The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte YUKIO YANO ____________ Appeal No. 1998-1098 Application No. 08/308,426 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION ON APPEAL This is a supplemental decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the rejection of claims 1-12 and 14-34. On September 12, 2000, we issued a decision affirming the rejection of claims 20-34 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1, and reversing the rejections of claims 1-12 and 14-19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over AAPA and of claims 20-34 under § 103 as obvious over AAPA in view of Fox.Page: 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007