The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 60 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JAMES J. BARBER and CARL SNYDER ____________ Appeal No. 1998-1226 Application No. 08/420,330 ____________ HEARD: May 15, 2001 ____________ Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 34 through 36, 39, 40, 42, 49, 53 through 57, and refusal to allow claims 50 through 52 as amended subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendment dated Dec. 9, 1996, Paper No. 45, entered as per the Advisory Action dated Jan. 2, 1997, Paper No. 47). Claims 34-36, 39, 40, 42 and 49-57 on appeal are the only claims remaining in this application.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007