Ex parte STRAUCH et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1231                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/729,835                                                  


          signal is generated to prevent motor torque disturbances from               
          affecting the velocity of the driven member.  An understanding              
          of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary                 
          claim 1, which is reproduced as follows:                                    
               1.  An apparatus for controlling velocity of a motor                   
          component driven in a single direction by a motor, comprising:              
               a first sensor to detect the velocity of the driven                    
          component in a single direction and generate a first signal                 
          indicative thereof;                                                         
               a second sensor to detect the velocity of the motor and                
          generate a second signal indicative thereof; and                            
               a controller, responsive to the first signal and the                   
          second signal, for generating a motor control signal to                     
          prevent motor torque disturbances from affecting the velocity               
          of the driven component.                                                    
               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Yoshida et al. (Yoshida)       4,529,920          Jul. 16,                  
          1985                                                                        
               Claims 1-11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                
          paragraph, as containing subject matter which was not                       
          described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably               
          convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventors,               
          at the time the application was filed, had possession of the                
          claimed invention.                                                          







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007