Appeal No. 1998-1276 Application No. 08/232,339 consider an obviousness-type double patenting rejection of the appealed claims over the claims of appellants' issued patent, Patent No. 6,096,488. The patented application is a continuation of the present application. In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) PETER F. KRATZ ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) CATHERINE TIMM ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ECK:clm -9-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007