Appeal No. 1998-1298
Application 08/544,962
not sustained the rejection of claims 1, 2, 5, 11, 13,
and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Goodman, Moser, Dreffein, or Abraham in view of Foster ‘686;
not sustained the rejection of claim 9 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a)as being unpatentable over Goodman, Moser, Dreffein,
or Abraham in view of Foster ‘686, Klein, and Foster ‘678; and
not sustained the rejection of claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 11, 13,
and 14 under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-
type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims of
U.S. Patent No. 5,588,522 (Foster ‘522).
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007