Appeal No. 1998-1317
Application No. 08/522,112
The Examiner relies on the following references:
Davida et al. (Davida) 4,275,265 Jun. 23,
1981 Guberman et al. (Guberman) 5,313,527 May
17, 1994
Huttenlocher et al. (Huttenlocher) 5,384,863 Jan. 24,
1995
Stroke, “Optical computing,” IEEE Spectrum, 24-41 (Dec. 1972).
Russ, The Image Processing Handbook, 199-201 (2nd ed., Boca
Raton, FL, CRC Press, Inc., 1995).
Claim 8 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Guberman in view of Huttenlocher and further
in view of Davida and Stroke, and claim 9 stands rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the noted combination of references
combined with Russ.
Rather than reiterate all arguments of Appellant and the
Examiner, reference is made to the briefs and answer for the 1
respective details thereof.
OPINION
1 See the Appeal Brief filed May 29, 1997, and the Reply
Brief filed October 16, 1997. Examiner mailed an Office
communication on November 12, 1997, stating that the Reply
Brief has been entered.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007