Ex parte ANSELMANN et al. - Page 1




                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and           
                                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                           
                                                                                                          Paper No. 21              

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                           ____________                                                             

                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                           ____________                                                             

                                   Ex parte RALF ANSELMANN, CARSTEN GRIESSMANN,                                                     
                                         MANUELA LOCH, AND KURT MARQUARD                                                            
                                                           ____________                                                             

                                                       Appeal No. 1998-1353                                                         
                                                     Application No. 08/488,288                                                     
                                                           ____________                                                             

                                                             ON BRIEF                                                               
                                                           ____________                                                             

               Before JOHN D. SMITH, KRATZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                 
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                   




                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             

                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims             

               1-9.  Claims 1 and 6 were amended, claims 2-4 canceled, and claim 10 added by the amendment                          

               after-final mailed November 27, 1996 (Paper No. 8).  This amendment was entered as per the                           

               Advisory Action mailed on January 29, 1997 (Paper No. 9).  Therefore, claims 1 and                                   

               5-10, which are all of the claims presently pending in this application, are on appeal.                              








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007