Ex parte KINSMAN et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1405                                                        
          Application No. 08/379,600                                                  



          and reads as follows:                                                       





                    7.  A process for the preparation of a metal                      
               sulphide which comprises reacting an elementary carbon                 
               source and gaseous H S at a temperature of 900 to 1500EC               
                                   2                                                  
               to produce gaseous CS  in a first reaction zone, passing               
                                    2                                                 
               the gaseous product from the first reaction zone,                      
               containing CS  prepared in situ and unreacted H S,2                               2                       
               directly to a second reaction zone, which is separate                  
               from the first reaction zone, containing a metal oxide                 
               corresponding to the metal sulphide and reacting the                   
               metal oxide with the gaseous CS  at a temperature of from              
                                              2                                       
               500 to 1500EC to prepare the metal sulphide.                           
               In support of his rejection, the examiner relies on the                
          following prior art:                                                        
          Johnson et al. (Johnson)           3,009,781           Nov. 21,             
          1961                                                                        
          Henderson et al. (Henderson)       3,748,095           Jul. 24,             
          1973                                                                        
               Claims 7 through 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Henderson and              
          Johnson.                                                                    
               We have carefully reviewed the claims, specification and               
          applied prior art, including all of the arguments advanced by               
          both the examiner and appellants in support of their                        

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007