Ex parte STYCZINSKI - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-1517                                        Page 2           
          Application No. 08/685,269                                                   




                                        BACKGROUND                                     
               Appellant's invention relates to a redundant array of                   
          disk drives with asymmetric mirroring.  An understanding of                  
          the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim               
          1, which is reproduced as follows:                                           
               1.  A method for processing data in data processing                     
          system including a redundant array of independent disk drives                
          (RAID) operatively controlled by an array controller                         
          comprising the steps of:                                                     
               providing a plurality of data drives and a single                       
          predefined mirror drive in the RAID; said single predefined                  
          mirror drive having a set capacity substantially greater than                
          a capacity of each of said plurality of data drives;                         
               writing data to multiple data drives in the RAID;                       
               writing a mirror copy of said written data to said                      
          predefined mirror drive in the RAID; and                                     
               reading data from said multiple data drives.                            
                                                                                      
               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                    
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                                
          Jacobson et al. (Jacobson)    5,392,244            Feb. 21, 1995.            
                                                   (filed Aug. 19, 1993)               
               Claims 1-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being               
          unpatentable over Jacobson.                                                  









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007