The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex Parte WEN-BING KANG, NU YU and AKIHIKO TOKIDA
_______________
Appeal No. 1998-1726
Application 08/681,117
_______________
HEARD: March 20, 2001
_______________
Before, LIEBERMAN, TIMM and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims
1
1-8. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.
1The Applicants mistakenly indicate that claims 12 to 15 and 18 are pending in this application
and claims 1 to 11 and 16 have been canceled. (Brief pg. 2). In the argument section of the Brief,
Applicants correctly indicate that claims 1-8 stand rejected.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007