Appeal No. 1998-1754 Application 08/555,918 Accordingly, the examiner has failed to make a prima facie case of obviousness. We need not consider the tertiary references of Keskkula, Hadgraft, and Kunishige because these references were not relied upon by the examiner to cure the aforementioned deficiencies of the combination of Henry in view of Dales. The rejections of the dependent claims cannot be sustained because of the aforementioned deficiencies. REVERSED Bradley R. Garris ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Thomas A. Waltz ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Beverly Pawlikowski ) Administrative Patent Judge ) BAP/cam 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007