Ex parte KOJIMA et al. - Page 2


                       Appeal No. 1998-1779                                                                                                                      
                       Application No. 08/658,447                                                                                                                

                        1.       A cathode ray tube, comprising:                                                                                                 
                       a front panel coated with a nonglare film having a multi-layered structure,                                                               
                       wherein said multi-layered structure comprises:                                                                                           
                       a light absorbing layer containing a colored dye, and an antistatic layer                                                                 
                       containing an inorganic metal compound as an electrically conductive agent, wherein said                                                  
                       inorganic metal compound is at least 40% by weight of said antistatic layer.                                                              
                             17. A cathode ray tube comprising:                                                                                                  
                             a front panel coated with a nonglare film having a multi-layered structure,                                                         
                             wherein said multi-layered structure comprises:                                                                                     
                       a light absorbing layer containing a colored dye, and                                                                                     
                       an antistatic layer containing an inorganic metal compound as an electrically                                                             
                       conductive agent;                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                                                
                       wherein a density of said colored dye varies along a surface of the cathode ray                                                           
                       tube.                                                                                                                                     
                       The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                                                                           
                        Deal et al. (Deal)                                      4,563,612                             Jan. 07, 1986                              
                        Itou et al. (Itou)                                      4,987,338                             Jan. 22, 1991                              
                       Morikawa et al. (Morikawa)                               61-118946                             Oct. 17, 1986                              
                       (Japanese Patent Abstracts)                                                                                                               


                       Claims 1-11 and 16-25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                                                          
                       over Morikawa, Itou and Deal.                                                                                                             
                       The respective positions of the examiner and the appellants with regard to the                                                            
                       propriety of these rejections are set forth in the the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 16) and                                               
                       the appellants’ brief and reply brief (Paper Nos. 15 and 17, respectively).                                                               





                                                                               2                                                                                 



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007