Appeal No. 1998-1827 Page 10
Application No. 08/644,932
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 2, 4-7 and
18-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph as lacking
descriptive support in the specification, as filed; to reject
claims 2, 4-7 and 18-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph
on the ground that the specification is non-enabling; and to
reject claims 2, 4-7 and 18-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph as being indefinite for failing to particularly
point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which
applicant regards as the invention is reversed.
REVERSED
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
PETER F. KRATZ ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ROMULO H. DELMENDO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
PFK/sld
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007