Ex parte BACKLUND et al. - Page 4




             Appeal No. 1998-1832                                                                                    
             Application No. 08/434,331                                                                              


                           supplying said regenerated bleaching chemical to at least one of said                     
             chlorine-     free bleaching step or said oxygen delignification step.                                  


             THE REFERENCES OF RECORD                                                                                

                    As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon the following references:                   

             Smith et al. (Smith)               3,725,194                         Apr.   3, 1973                     
             Reeve et al. (Reeve)               4,039,372                         Aug.   2, 1977                     
             Phillips et al. (Phillips)         4,372,812                         Feb.    8, 1983                    
             Mannbro                            4,595,455                         Jun.   17, 1986                    
             Santén et al. (Santén)      4,601,786                                Jul.    22, 1986                   
             Henricson                          5,340,440                         Aug.  23, 1994                     

             Ahlstrom Brochure (Ahlstrom), “New generation kraft pulping and bleaching                               
             technology,” no page numbering (1992).                                                                  

                                                                                                                    
                                                THE REJECTIONS                                                       

             Claims 1, 3 through 14 and 16 through 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                 

             § 103 as being unpatentable over Henricson in view of Phillips, and Smith with or                       

             without Mannbro, Reeve, or Ahlstrom.                                                                    

             Claim 15 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                               

             Henricson in view of Phillips, and Smith with or without Mannbro, Reeve or Ahlstrom                     

             and further in view of Santén.                                                                          

             Claims 1, and 3 through 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second                                 

             paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the           

                                                         4                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007