Appeal No. 1998-1832 Application No. 08/434,331 supplying said regenerated bleaching chemical to at least one of said chlorine- free bleaching step or said oxygen delignification step. THE REFERENCES OF RECORD As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon the following references: Smith et al. (Smith) 3,725,194 Apr. 3, 1973 Reeve et al. (Reeve) 4,039,372 Aug. 2, 1977 Phillips et al. (Phillips) 4,372,812 Feb. 8, 1983 Mannbro 4,595,455 Jun. 17, 1986 Santén et al. (Santén) 4,601,786 Jul. 22, 1986 Henricson 5,340,440 Aug. 23, 1994 Ahlstrom Brochure (Ahlstrom), “New generation kraft pulping and bleaching technology,” no page numbering (1992). THE REJECTIONS Claims 1, 3 through 14 and 16 through 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Henricson in view of Phillips, and Smith with or without Mannbro, Reeve, or Ahlstrom. Claim 15 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Henricson in view of Phillips, and Smith with or without Mannbro, Reeve or Ahlstrom and further in view of Santén. Claims 1, and 3 through 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007