Ex parte BORS et al. - Page 5





                      Appeal No. 1998-1834                                                                                                                
                      Application No. 08/467,631                                                                                                          



                               On this record, appellants alone disclose a method for improving the dirt                                                  
                      pick-up resistance of a dried coating formed from a coalescent-free aqueous                                                         
                      coating composition containing an aqueous emulsion-polymerized polymeric binder                                                     
                      having a glass transition temperature from about -15ºC to about +15ºC.                                                              
                               We are mindful that when the PTO shows sound basis for believing that the                                                  
                      products of the applicant and the prior art are the same, the burden of persuasion                                                  
                      shifts and applicant has the burden of showing that they are not. In re Spada, 911                                                  
                      F.2d at 708, 15 USPQ2d at 1658; In re Best, 562 F.2d 1252, 1255, 195 USPQ                                                           
                      430, 433 (CCPA 1977).  On this record, however, the examiner has not established                                                    
                      a sound basis to justify shifting the burden to appellants to demonstrate that the prior                                            
                      art compositions are not the same or substantially the same as that of appellants.  It                                              
                      is not enough, as the examiner seems to believe, that the prior art discloses an                                                    
                      aqueous emulsion-polymerized polymeric binder containing an amount, by weight,                                                      
                      of at least one copolymerized ethylenically-unsaturated active methylene monomer                                                    
                      which embraces the amount recited in appellants’ claims.                                                                            







                                                                            5                                                                             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007