Appeal No. 1998-1853
Application No. 08/397,292
chapter 1, pp. 5-8, and 38 (1993). (Windows™)
Claims 1, 13, 25, 30 and 31 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Dworkin and Maki. Claims 2,
3, 14, 16, 26 and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Dworkin, Maki and Quentin, while claim
5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Dworkin, Maki and Windows™.
Rather than repeat the positions and the arguments of
appellants and the examiner, we make reference to the briefs1
and the answer for their respective positions.
OPINION
We have considered the rejections advanced by the
examiner. We have, likewise, reviewed appellants’ arguments
against the rejections as set forth in the briefs. It is our
view that the rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are not proper.
Accordingly, we reverse.
1A reply brief was filed (paper no. 18), which was considered and
entered by the examiner without any further response. (See paper no. 20.)
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007