Appeal No. 1998-1862
Application No. 08/644,622
specification results would have been truly unexpected by one
of ordinary skill in the art in light of the teachings of the
prior art.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner's
decision rejecting the appealed claims is reversed.
The application is remanded to the examiner for
considera-tion of the issues outlined above.
This application, by virtue of its “special” status,
requires an immediate action. MPEP § 708.01(D)(Rev. 1, Feb.
2000).
REVERSED AND REMANDED
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
THOMAS A. WALTZ ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ROMULO H. DELMENDO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
vsh
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007