Ex parte GEVAUD et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1998-1872                                                                                         
              Application No. 08/568,285                                                                                   

                                                    BACKGROUND                                                             
                     The disclosed invention is directed to a helium leak detector for detecting leaks in a                
              device under test.  Claim 1 is reproduced below.                                                             
                     1.     A leak detector including at least one analysis unit connected to the inlet of a               
                     first secondary pump, a pre-evacuation set connected to an inlet coupling, the inlet                  
                     of said pre-evacuation set further being connected to the outlet of said first                        
                     secondary pump via a pipe provided with a first valve, wherein said pre-evacuation                    
                     set comprises a second secondary pump and a mechanical primary pump                                   
                     connected together in series, and wherein a pipe provided with a second valve                         
                     connects an intermediate point of said first secondary pump to the inlet of said                      
                     secondary pump.                                                                                       
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                      
              Saulgeot                            4,773,256                           Sep. 27, 1988                        
              Baret                               5,297,422                           Mar. 29, 1994                        
                     Claims 1-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                            
              Saulgeot and Baret.                                                                                          
                     We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 8) and the Examiner's Answer (Paper                        
              No. 15) for a statement of the examiner's position and to the Brief (Paper No. 14) and the                   
              Reply Brief (Paper No. 17) for appellants’ position with respect to the claims which stand                   
              rejected.                                                                                                    


                                                        OPINION                                                            
              Grouping of Claims                                                                                           



                                                            -2-                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007