Appeal No. 1998-1916 Page 9 Application No. 08/406,392 from the prior art would have suggested the combination. The addition of Bauer does not cure the aforementioned defect. Therefore, we reverse the rejection of claims 10-13 as obvious over Clabburn in view of Kalb and Bauer. CONCLUSION In summary, the rejection of claims 10-13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Clabburn in view of Kalb and Bauer is reversed.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007