Appeal No. 1998-1926
Application 08/333,829
view of Schneier.
3. Claims 18-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over the teachings of Stambler in view
of Haber.
4. Claim 12 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Stambler in view of
Schneier and further in view of Haber.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the
examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answers for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner and the
evidence of anticipation and obviousness relied upon by the
examiner as support for the rejections. We have, likewise,
reviewed and taken into consideration, in reaching our
decision, the appellant’s arguments set forth in the briefs
along with the examiner’s rationale in support of the
rejections and arguments in rebuttal set forth in the
examiner’s answers.
It is our view, after consideration of the record
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007