Ex parte BOYER et al. - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for            
                       publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
                                                                             Paper No. 24            
                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                   
                                           ____________                                              
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                      
                                       AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                           ____________                                              
                             Ex parte KEITH G. BOYER, RICHARD A. GILL,                               
                                       and THOMAS H. GOHL                                            
                                           ____________                                              
                                        Appeal No. 1998-2072                                         
                                      Application No. 08/777,054                                     
                                           ____________                                              
                                             ON BRIEF                                                
                                           ____________                                              
           Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                 
           BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                 




                                       DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                 This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final        
           rejection of claims 18-34, which are all the claims remaining in the application.         
                 We reverse.                                                                         













Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007