Appeal No. 1998-2129 Page 12
Application No. 08/561,816
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Meeker and to reject
claims 1-7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Zerfass in view of Meeker is reversed. The decision of the
examiner to reject claims 1-7 under the judicially created
doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being
unpatentable over claims 1, 10 and 21 of Lassiter (Re. 35,603)
in view of Meeker is affirmed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007