Appeal No. 1998-2133 Application No. 08/448,585 In our opinion, the secondary references relied upon by the examiner to show the use of a plurality of mixers in series do not give rise to a prima facie case of obviousness since they are not particularly pertinent to the very specific problem faced by appellant. Namely, the problem of insufficient mixing apparently arises in a very specific context, i.e., using a particular type of mixer, a fluidizing mixer, for ozone bleaching of medium consistency pulp where large bubbles of ozone form in the mixer. Oldshue apparently does not relate to the use of a fluidizing mixer, nor is that reference particularly concerned with medium consistency pulp. While Richter (Figure 3) suggests using a plurality of fluidizing mixers directly connected in series, Richter does not suggest that the treatment fluid or bleaching agent be added only into the first mixer in the series. Bosenius feeds a different bleaching agent into each of a plurality of fluidizing mixers. Accordingly, Bosenius does not relate to the problem addressed by appellant since, in Bosenius, the ozone requirement is apparently reduced by using additional bleaching agents. Further, as we construe 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007