Appeal No. 1998-2134 Application No. 08/585,217 appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 for the findings of fact and conclusions set forth at pages 5 through 22 of the Answer. We add the following for emphasis and completeness. At the outset, we note that appellant has grouped the claims on appeal as follows (Brief, page 6): Group I - Claims 1 through 9, 11 through 13 and 16; and Group II - Claim 17. Therefore, we need only consider the propriety of the examiner’s § 103 rejections based on claims 1 and 17 consistent with 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7) (1995). Appellant does not dispute the examiner’s finding that both DuPont and Garmong describe a photocurable elastomeric composition comprising a generic elastomeric block copolymer binder inclusive of the claimed elastomeric block copolymer binder, the claimed free-radical-polymerizable compound and the claimed polymerization initiator. Compare Answer, pages 5-6, 8-9, 12-13 and 19-20 with Brief and Reply Brief in their entirety. However, both the examiner and appellant agree that neither DuPont nor Garmong specifically mentions the claimed 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007