Ex parte REINHARD et al. - Page 4




                 Appeal No. 1998-2183                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/529,195                                                                                                             


                                                              1                                                             2                         
                 appellants' specification  and claims, the applied teachings,                                                                          
                 the affidavit of Dr. Michael W. Spallek and technical articles                                                                         
                 (Exhibit B), the affidavit of Dr. Ewald Spingler,  and the                              3                                              


                          1We are informed by the “Description of the Prior Art”                                                                        
                 section of appellants' specification (pages 1 through 4) that,                                                                         
                 prior to the present invention, prefilled, sterile, disposable                                                                         
                 syringes for medicinal purposes were known.  According to                                                                              
                 appellants (specification, page 2), in all known disposable                                                                            
                 syringes for injections of < 5 ml, the barrel of the syringe                                                                           
                 at the very least is made of glass.  It is also pointed out                                                                            
                 (specification, page 3) that many types of glass are not                                                                               
                 suitable for gamma ray sterilization which is indicated to be                                                                          
                 a very simple, economical and harmless sterilization                                                                                   
                 procedure.  The specification (page 3) additionally indicates                                                                          
                 that prefilled, disposable plastic syringes with total fill                                                                            
                 volumes of at least 50 ml are known.  As stated by appellants                                                                          
                 (specification, page 4), known prefilled plastic syringes                                                                              
                 could not be stored for long periods of time due to loss of                                                                            
                 preparation components due to diffusion.  The specification                                                                            
                 (page 4) also notes that known plastic syringes are                                                                                    
                 constructed from a translucent plastic, permitting only                                                                                
                 limited visual inspection of the syringe contents.                                                                                     
                          2In our evaluation of the applied teachings, we have                                                                          
                 considered all of the disclosure of each teaching for what it                                                                          
                 would have fairly taught one of ordinary skill in the art.                                                                             
                 See In re Boe, 355 F.2d 961, 965, 148 USPQ 507, 510 (CCPA                                                                              
                 1966). Additionally, this panel of the Board has taken into                                                                            
                 account not only the specific teachings, but also the                                                                                  
                 inferences which one skilled in the art would reasonably have                                                                          
                 been expected to draw from the disclosure.  See In re Preda,                                                                           
                 401 F.2d 825, 826, 159 USPQ 342, 344 (CCPA 1968).                                                                                      

                          3While labeled affidavits, the last paragraph of each of                                                                      
                 the Spallek and Spingler documents respectively reveals that                                                                           
                 they are declarations.                                                                                                                 
                                                                           4                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007