Appeal No. 1998-2206 Application No. 08/537,143 and 16, a copy of which appears in the APPENDIX to the brief (Paper No. 11). As evidence of anticipation and obviousness, the examiner has applied the documents listed below: Monsees et al. 2,940,408 Jun. 14, 1960 (Monsees '408) Monsees et al. 3,122,072 Feb. 25, 1964 (Monsees '072) Fukuda 5,279,098 Jan. 18, 1994 The following rejections are before us for review. Claims 1 through 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Monsees '072 (with Monsees '408 incorporated by reference therein). Claims 16 through 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Fukuda in view of Monsees '072 (with Monsees '408 incorporated by reference therein). 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007