The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte THOMAS J. HUGHES ____________ Appeal No. 1998-2308 Application No. 08/379,868 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before OWENS, TIMM, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 23, which are all of the claims pending in the subject application.1 The subject matter on appeal relates to a method of depositing an oxidized metal coating on a substrate in a chamber having 1 The appellant filed an amendment under 37 CFR § 1.116 (1981) on April 8, 1996, proposing a change to claim 20. (Paper 6.) The proposed amendment was approved by the examiner and has been entered. (Advisory action of April 19, 1996, paper 7.)Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007