The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ARNOLD B. FINESTONE and GILBERT BLOCH
____________
Appeal No. 1998-2317
Application No. 08/327,601
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before OWENS, WALTZ, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1, 3 through 6, 8 and 10
through 12 as amended subsequent to the final rejection (see the
amendment dated Feb. 24, 1997, Paper No. 10, entered as per the
Advisory Action dated Mar. 21, 1997, Paper No. 11). Claims 1,
3-6, 8 and 10-12 are the only claims remaining in this
application.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007