The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte J. DANIEL BRYANT, ROBERT M. RAMAGE, ARMAND J. BEAUDOIN,
HIDETOSHI UCHIDA and HIDEO YOSHIDA
____________
Appeal No. 1998-2328
Application No. 08/560,138
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WALTZ, KRATZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 2 through 12, 18 and 19
as amended subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendment
dated Aug. 15, 1997, Paper No. 10, entered as per the Advisory
Action dated Aug. 20, 1997, Paper No. 11). Claim 21, the only
other claim pending in this application, does not form a part of
this appeal as it is objected to by the examiner but would be
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007